English Text → here
Wieso konnte Hitler im Jahre 1933 als Ergebnis demokratischer Wahlen mit der Regierungsbildung in Deutschland beauftragt werden, wenn seine verbrecherischen Absichten doch bereits für jedermann offenkundig gewesen sein sollen? Waren die Deutschen damals mehrheitlich und wissentlich ein Volk von Verbrechern, wenn Sie mit ihrem Stimmzettel Hitler zur Macht verholfen haben? Schon diese Frage ist suggestiv. Es gibt kaum noch lebende Zeitzeugen, die damals volljährig waren und aktuell Auskunft geben könnten. Und zumeist werden die Glaubwürdigkeit und das Erinnerungsvermögen angezweifelt. Zudem sind die meisten Schriften, Bild- und Tondokumente der NS-Zeit dem breiten Publikum immer noch unzugänglich. Dies trifft in besonderem Maße zu auf Hitlers politisches Bekenntnis Mein Kampf, erschienen vor etwa 90 Jahren.
Winston Churchill, der nachmalige britische Kriegspremier, hat sich schon frühzeitig mit dem Phänomen Hitler beschäftigt. Aus dem nachfolgenden Text ergibt sich eindeutig, daß er auch das Buch Mein Kampf bereits gelesen hatte, als im November 1935 sein berühmter Aufsatz: THE TRUTH ABOUT HITLER (Die Wahrheit über Hitler) in der Zeitschrift THE STRAND MAGAZINE erschien. Diese Veröffentlichung führte zu einer diplomatischen Verstimmung zwischen Deutschland und Großbritannien. (Quellen dazu am Ende dieses Beitrages). Knapp zwei Jahre später wurde dieser Aufsatz in leicht gekürzter Form im Churchills Buch GREAT CONTEMPORARIES (deutsch: Bedeutende Zeitgenossen) erneut veröffentlich. Der volle Text dieses Aufsatzes war bisher im Internet nicht recherchierbar, dem ist nun mit diesem Blog-Beitrag abgeholfen. Nachfolgend die kompletten Passagen mit den zugehörigen Illustrationen. Die Abweichungen zur späteren Veröffentlichung sind im Text hervorgehoben. Churchill bedient sich in seinem Werk einer pathetischen, blumigen Sprache. Eine wörtliche Übersetzung ins Deutsche würde den Text schwerfällig und gekünstelt erscheinen lassen. Daher sei an dieser Stelle auf eine Übersetzung verzichtet. Mit etwas Schulenglisch erschließt sich der Text ohnehin dem interessierten Leser.
Zweifellos ist der Autor zum damaligen Zeitpunkt von Hitler fasziniert, insbesondere sein Aufstieg vom Weltkriegsgefreiten und arbeitslosen Kunstmaler (Churchill spricht fälschlicherweise vom Unteroffizier (Corporal) und Housepainter (Anstreicher). Wörtlich: Corporal Hitler was fighting his long, wearing battle for the German heart. The story of that struggle cannot be read without admiration for the courage, the single- mindedness, and the personal force which enabled him to challenge, defy, overcome, or conciliate all the authorities or resistances which barred his path.
Die Gegensätze können kaum größer sein: Churchill entstammte altem Adel, nämlich den Herzögen von Marlborough, bereits sein Vater war Minister, er selbst vor dem ersten Weltkrieg bereits Gast des Kaisers und englischer Marineminister. Hitler war dagegen ein Niemand.
Churchill hat Vorahnungen: It is on this mystery of the future that history will pronounce Hitler either a monster or a hero. It is this which will determine whether he will rank in Valhalla with Pericles, with Augustus, and with Washington, or welter in the inferno of human scorn with Attila and Tamerlane. Seine Erwähnung der Hunnen- bzw. Mongolenkönige Attila und Tamerlan (= Dschingis Khan) ist nicht ohne Beigeschmack: Hatte doch die britische Propagande während des ersten Weltkrieges mit Greuelmärchen über Soldaten, die angeblich Kindern die Hände abhacken, die Deutschen insgesamt zu Hunnen erklärt. Aber immerhin hält er es auch für möglich, daß aus Hitler ein zweiter Kaiser Augustus wird. Interessant, daß Churchill in der zweiten Veröffentlichung den ganzen Abschnitt über die „Nacht der langen Messer“, nämlich den sogenannten →Röhm-Putsch, ausspart.
Anmerkung: Häufig wird das berühmte Churchill-Zitat: One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations. dem nachfolgenden Aufsatz zugeschrieben. Das ist nicht richtig. Dieses Zitat entstammt tatsächlich einem Artikel aus dem Evening Standard, vom 17. September 1937.
Der nachfolgende Text von Winston Churchill ist wortgleich erschienen im STRAND-MAGAZINE vom November 1935 unter dem Titel: „The truth about Hitler“ als auch in dem Buch vom August 1937 Great Comtemporaries unter dem Titel „Hitler and his choice“. Der letzte, besonders markierte Abschnitt über den sogenannten Röhmputsch(30.6.1934) fehlt im dem Buch. Die Abschnitte, die in der späteren Veröffentlichung GREAT COMTEMPORARIES fehlen, sind in blauer Farbe unterlegt.
>>>>Beginn des Textes<<<<
Strand Magazine Nov 1935, Churchill: The Truth about Hitler Page 10-11
THE TRUTH ABOUT HITLER ( renamed HITLER AND HIS CHOICE in 1937)
IT is not possible to form a just judgment of a public figure who has attained the enormous dimensions of Adolf Hitler until his life work as a whole is before us. Although no subsequent political action can condone wrong deeds or remove the guilt of blood, history is replete with examples of men who have risen to power by employing stern, grim, wicked, and even frightful methods, but who, nevertheless, when their life is revealed as a whole, have been regarded as great figures whose lives have enriched the story of mankind. So may it be with Hitler.
Such a final view is not vouchsafed to us to-day. We cannot tell whether Hitler will be the man who will once again let loose upon the world another war in which civilization will irretrievably succumb, or whether he will go down in history as the man who restored honour and peace of mind to the great Germanic nation and brought them back serene, helpful and strong, to the European family circle.
It is on this mystery of the future that history will pronounce Hitler either a monster or a hero. It is this which will determine whether he will rank in Valhalla with Pericles, with Augustus, and with Washington, or welter in the inferno of human scorn with Attila and Tamerlane. It is enough to say that both possibilities arc open at the present moment. If, because the story is unfinished, because, indeed, its most fateful chapters have yet to be written, we are forced to dwell upon the dark side of his work and creed, we must never forget nor cease to hope for the bright alternative.
Adolf Hitler was the child of the rage and grief of a mighty empire and race who had suffered overwhelming defeat in war. He it was who exorcized the spirit of despair from the German I mind by substituting the not less baleful but far less morbid spirit of revenge. When the terrible German armies, which had held half Europe in their grip, recoiled on every front and sought armistice from those upon whose lands even then they still stood as invaders; when the pride and willpower of the Prussian race broke into surrender and revolution behind the fighting lines; when that Imperial Government, which had been for more than fifty fearful months the terror of almost all nations, collapsed ignominiously, leaving its loyal faithful subjects defenceless and disarmed before the wrath of the sorely-wounded victorious Allies ; then it was that one Austrian corporal, a former house-painter, set out to regain all.
In the fifteen years that have followed this resolve he has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very large extent, reversed the results of the Great War Sir John Simon, as Foreign Secretary, said at Berlin that he made no distinction between victors and vanquished. Such distinctions, indeed, still exist, but the vanquished are in process of becoming the victors, and the victors the vanquished. When Hitler began, Germany lay prostrate at the feet of the Allies. He may yet see the day when what is left of Europe will be prostrate at the feet of Germany. Whatever else may be thought about these exploits, they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world.
STRAND MAGAZINE Nov 1935 Churchill: The Truth about Hitler, page 12-13
Hitler’s success, and, indeed, his survival as a political force, would not have been possible but for the lethargy and folly of the French and British Governments since the War, and especially in the last three years. No sincere attempt was made to come to terms with the various moderate governments of Germany, which existed upon a parliamentary system. For a long time the French pursued the absurd delusion that they could extract vast indemnities from the Germans in order to compensate them for the devastation of the War.
Figures of reparation payments were adopted, not only by the French but by the British, which had no relation whatever to any process which exists, or could ever be devised, of transferring wealth from one community to a other. To enforce submission to these senseless demands, French armies actually reoccupied the Ruhr in 1923. To recover even a tenth of what was originally demanded, an inter-allied board, presided over by an able American, supervised the internal finances of Germany for several years, thus renewing and perpetuating the utmost bitterness in the minds of the defeated nation. In fact, nothing was gained at the cost of all this friction; for, although the Allies extracted about one thousand million pounds’ worth of assets from the Germans, the United States, and to a lesser extent Great Britain, lent Germany at the same time over two thousand millions more than she had paid. Yet, while the Allies poured their wealth into Germany to build her up and revive her life and industry, the only results were an increasing resentment and the loss of their money. Even while Germany was receiving great benefits by the loans which were made to her, Hitler’s movement gained each week life and force from irritation at Allied interference.
I have always laid down the doctrine that the redress of the grievances of the vanquished should precede the disarmament of the victors. Little was done to redress the grievances of the treaties of Versailles and Trianon. Hitler in his campaign could point continually to a number of minor anomalies and racial injustices in the territorial arrangements of Europe, which fed the fires on which he lived.
At the same time, the English pacifists, aided from a safe distance by their American prototypes, forced the process of disarmament into the utmost prominence.
Year after year, without the slightest regard to the realities of the world, the Disarmament Commission explored in numerable schemes for reducing the armaments of the Allies, none of which was pursued with any sincerity by any country except Great Britain. The United States, while preaching disarmament, continued to make enormous developments in her army, navy, and air force. France, deprived of the promised United States guarantee and confronted with the gradual revival of Germany with its tremendous military population, naturally refused to reduce her defences below the danger point. Italy, for other reasons, increased her armaments. Only England cut her defences by land and sea far below the safety level, and appeared quite unconscious of the new peril which was developing in the air.
Strand Magazine Nov 1935, Churchill: The Truth about Hitler, pages 14-15
Meanwhile, the Germans, principally under the Brüning Government, began their great plans to regain their armed power. These were pressed forward by every channel. The air-sport and commercial aviation became a mere cloak behind which a tremendous organization for the purposes of air war was spread over every part of Germany. The German general staff, forbidden by the treaty, grew year by year to an enormous size under the guise of the State guidance of industry. All the factories of Germany were prepared in incredible detail to be turned to war production.
These preparations, although assiduously concealed, were nevertheless known to the intelligence departments both of France and Great Britain. But nowhere in either of these governments was there the commanding power either to call Germany to a halt or to endeavour to revise the treaties. The former course would have been quite safe and easy, at any rate, until the end of 1931, but at that time Mr. MacDonald and his colleagues were still contenting themselves with uttering high-sounding platitudes upon the blessings of peace and gaining the applause of well-meaning but ill-informed majorities throughout our island, liven as late as 1932 the greatest pressure was put upon France to reduce her armed strength, when at the same time the French knew that immense preparations were going forward in all parts of Germany. I explained and exposed the follies of this process repeatedly and in detail in the House of Commons, but nobody paid the slightest attention. Eventually, all that came out of the Disarmament conferences was the Rearmament of Germany.
While all these formidable transformations were occurring in Europe, Corporal Hitler was fighting his long, wearing battle for the German heart. The story of that struggle cannot be read without admiration for the courage, the single- mindedness, and the personal force which enabled him to challenge, defy, overcome, or conciliate all the authorities or resistances which barred his path. He, and the ever-increasing legions who worked with him, certainly showed at this time, in their patriotic ardour and love of country, that there was nothing they would not do or dare, no sacrifice of life, limb or liberty that they would not make themselves or inflict upon their opponents.
Here is no place to tell that tale. Its main episodes are well known. The riotous meetings, the bloody fusillade at Munich, Hitler’s imprisonment, his various arrests and trials, his conflict with Hindenburg, his electoral campaign, von Papen’s tergiversation, Hitler’s conquest of Hindenburg, Hindenburg’s desertion of Brüning—all these were the milestones upon that indomitable march which carried the Austrian corporal to the life-dictatorship of the entire German nation of nearly seventy million souls, constituting the most industrious, capable, fierce, militaristic and resentful race in the world.
Hitler arrived at supreme power in Germany at the head of a national socialist movement which wiped out all the states and old kingdoms of Germany and fused them into one whole. At the same time, Nazidom suppressed and obliterated by force, wherever necessary, all other parties in the State.
Strand Magazine Nov 1935, Churchill: The Truth about Hitler, pages 16-17
At this very moment he found that the secret organization of German industry and aviation; which the German general staff and latterly the Brüning Government had built up, was in fact absolutely ready to be put into operation.
So far, no one had dared to take this step. Fear that the Allies would intervene and nip everything in the bud had restrained them. But Hitler had risen by violence and passion; he was surrounded by men as ruthless as he. It is probable that, when he overthrew the existing constitutional Government of Germany, he did not know how far they had prepared the ground for his action, certainly he has never done them the justice to recognize their contribution to his success. He even drove the patriotic Brüning, under threat of murder, from German soil.
The fact remains that all he and Goering had to do was to give the signal for the most gigantic process of secret rearmament that has ever taken place. He had long proclaimed that, if he came into power, he would do two things that no one else could do for Germany but himself. First, he would restore Germany to the height of her power in Europe, and secondly, he would cure the cruel unemployment that afflicted the people.
His methods are now apparent. Germany was to recover her place in Europe by rearming, and the Germans were to be largely freed from the curse of unemployment by being set to work on making the armaments and other military preparations. Thus from the year 1933 onwards the whole available energies of Germany were directed to preparations for war, not only in the factories, in the barracks, and on the aviation grounds, but in the schools, the colleges, and almost in the nursery, by every resource of State power and modem propaganda ; and the preparation and education of the whole people for war-readiness was undertaken.
It was not till 1935 that the full terror of this revelation broke upon the careless and imprudent world, and Hitler, casting aside concealment, sprang forward armed to the teeth, with his munition factories roaring night and day, his aeroplane squadrons forming in ceaseless succession, his submarine crews exercising in the Baltic, and his armed hosts tramping the barrack squares from one end of the broad Reich to the other. hat is where we are to-day, and the achievement by which the tables, have been completely turned upon the complacent, feckless, and purblind victors deserves to be reckoned a prodigy in the history of the world, and a prodigy which is inseparable from the personal exertions and lifethrust of a single man.
It is certainly not strange that everyone should want to know “the truth about Hitler.” What will he do with the tremendous powers already in his grasp and perfecting themselves week by week ? If, as I have said, we look only at the past, which is all we have to judge by, we must indeed feel anxious. Hitherto, Hitler’s Triumphant Career has been borne onwards, not only by a passionate love of Germany, but by currents of hatred so intense as to sear the souls of those who swim upon them.
Strand Magazine Nov 1935, CHurchill: The truth about Hitler, pages 18-19
Hatred of the French is the first of these currents, and we have only to read Herr Hitler’s book, Mein Kampf, to see that the French are not the only foreign nation against whom the anger of rearmed Germany may be turned.
But the internal stresses are even more striking. The Jews, supposed to have contributed, by a disloyal and pacifist influence, to the collapse of Germany at the end of the Great War, were also deemed to be the main prop of communism and the authors of defeatist doctrines in every form. Therefore , the Jews of Germany, a community numbered by many hundreds of thousands, were to be stripped of all power, driven from every position in public and social life, expelled from the professions, silenced in the Press, and declared a foul and odious race.
The twentieth century has witnessed with surprise, not merely the promulgation of these ferocious doctrines, but their being enforced with brutal vigour by the government and by the populace. No past services, no proved patriotism, even wounds sustained in war, could procure immunity for persons whose only crime was that their parents had brought them into the world. Every kind of persecution, grave or petty, upon the world-famous scientists, writers, and composers at the top to the wretched little Jewish children in the national schools, was practised, was glorified, and is still being practised and glorified.
A similar proscription fell upon socialists and communists of every hue. The Trade Unionists and liberal intelligentsia are equally smitten. The slightest criticism is an offence against the State. The courts of justice, though allowed to function in ordinary cases, are superseded for every form of political offence by so-called people’s courts composed of ardent Nazis. Side by side with the training grounds of the new armies and the great aerodromes, the concentration camps pock-mark the German soil. In these thousands of Germans are coerced and cowed into submission to the irresistible power of the Totalitarian State.
The hatred of the Jews led by a logical transition to an attack upon the historic basis of Christianity. Thus the conflict broadened swiftly, and Catholic priests and Protestant pastors fell under the ban of what is becoming the new religion of the German peoples, namely, the worship of Germany under the symbols of the old gods of Nordic paganism. Here also is where we stand to-day.
What manner of man is this grim figure who has performed these superb toils and loosed these frightful evils? Does he still share the passions he has evoked ? Does he, in the full sunlight of worldly success, at the head of the great nation he has raised from the dust, still feel wracked by the hatreds and antagonisms of his desperate struggle: or will they be discarded like the armour and the cruel weapons of strife under the mellowing influences of success? Evidently a burning question for men of all nations! Those who have met Herr Hitler face to face in public business or on social terms have found a highly competent, cool, well- informed functionary with an agreeable manner, a disarming smile, and few have been unaffected by a subtle personal magnetism. Nor is this impression merely the dazzle of power. He exerted it on his companions at every stage in his struggle, even when his fortunes were in the lowest depths. Thus the world lives on hopes that the worst is over and that we may yet live to see Hitler a gentler figure in a happier age.
Strand Magazine Nov 1935, Churchill: The Truth about Hitler, pages 20-21
Meanwhile, he makes speeches to the nations which are characterized by candour and moderation. Recently he has offered many words of reassurance, eagerly lapped up by those who have been so tragically wrong about Germany in the past. Only time can show, but, meanwhile, the great wheels revolve ; the rifles, the cannon, the tanks, the shot and shells, the air-bombs, the poison-gas cylinders,the aeroplanes, the submarines, and now the beginnings of a fleet flow in ever- broadening streams from the already largely war- mobilized arsenals and factories of Germany.
In the annals of the new triumphant Germany there is a lurid anniversary. It is the 30th of June. On that night last year many hundreds of men and some women were put to death in Germany without law, without accusation, without trial. These persons represented many varieties of life and thought of Germany. There were Nazis and anti-Nazis. There were Generals and Communists; there were Jews, Protestants, and Catholics. Some were rich and some were poor; some were young and some were old; some were famous and some were humble. But all had one thing in common, namely, that they were deemed to be obnoxious or obstructive to the Hitler regime. Therefore, they were blotted out.
Armed police caught them in the streets, shot them in their beds, shot the wife who threw herself before her husband, dragged all manner of people to the different goals—killed some on the way— sent others to face the firing parties on the outskirts of Berlin. The sinister volleys succeeded each other through along morning, afternoon, and night. The relations who ventured to inquire for the missing father, brother or son received, after a considerable interval, a small urn containing cremated ashes.
The history of the world is full of gruesome, squalid episodes of this kind, from the butcheries of ancient Rome and the numberless massacres which have stained the history of Asiadown to the smellings out of the Zulu and Hottentot witch-doctors. But in all its ups and downs mankind has always recoiled in horror from such events; and every record which has pretended to be that of a civilized race has proclaimed its detestation of them.
Adolf Hitler took upon himself the full responsibility. It is true that he explained that many more people were murdered—for I call the slaughter of a human being in peace without trial murder—who were not on his list. Zealous lieutenants we are assured filled in the gaps, sometimes with public, and sometimes with their own private enemies; and some of them were executed themselves for having overstepped the mark. What a mark!
But the astounding thing is that the great German people, educated, scientific, philosophical, romantic, the people of Christmas tree, the people of Goethe and Schiller, of Bach and Beethoven, Heine, Leibnitz, Kant and a hundred other great names, have not only not resented this horrible blood-bath, but have endorsed it and acclaimed its author with the honours not only of a sovereign but almost of a God. Here is the frightful fact before which what is left of European civilization must bow its head in shame, and what is to more practical purpose, in fear.
Can we really believe that a hierarchy and society built upon such deeds can be entrusted with the possession of the most prodigious military machinery yet planned among men? Can we believe that by such powers the world may regain “the joy, the peace and glory of mankind”? The answer, if answer there be, other than the most appalling negative, is contained in that mystery called HITLER.
>>>>Ende des Textes<<<<
Wie oben erwähnt, löste dieser Aufsatz eine diplomatische Verstimmung aus. Die New York Times schrieb dazu in Ihrer Ausgabe vom 30. Oktober 1935:
GERMANS PROTEST CHURCHILL ATTACK AS LIBELING HITLER
Reich Envoy to Complain of ‚Malicious‘ References in a Magazine Article.NEUTRALITY SHIFT HINTED
Berlin Indicates That Growing British Criticism Will Alter Stand in African Crisis.
Special cable to THE NEW YORK TIMES.
BERLIN, Oct. 30.—An official communiqué announced today that the German Ambassador to Great Britain had been ordered to protest an article by Winston Churchill in The Strand Magazine of London, on the ground that it attacks Chancellor Hitler in „malicious fashion.“ „Former English Cabinet Minister Churchill had published in The Strand Magazine an article which attacks in almost unsurpassably malicious fashion National Socialism and its Fuehrer,“ says the communique.“The magazine, which has given itself to such agitations, is prohibited in the Reich for an unlimited period. „In view of the libels against theGerman head of the State contained in Churchill’s remarks, the German Ambassador to London has been empowered to call attention to unheard-of remarks by a member of the government party and to protest sharply to the proper authorities .“
Other Criticism Deplored. By The Associated Press.
BERLIN, Oct. 30.—Germany’s protest regarding the Winston Churchill article brings to the fore a feeling of disappointment in German quarters over recent speeches by numerous statesmen, including Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin and Sir Samuel Hoare, British Foreign Secretary, which were taken here to be unfriendly. „If such expressions as Churchill’s are repeated very often we most certainly would have to reconsider our neutrality position in the Italo-Ethiopian conflict,“ said a government spokesman, indicating that Britain could not expect much from Hitler. [Mr. Churchill, in a speech in the House of Commons several days ago, lashed out at Nazism and called Germany a greater menace to European peace through her rearmament than the Italo-Ethiopian war.]
Churchill Continues Attack. Special Cable to THE NEW YORK TIMES.
LONDON. Oct. 30. — Winston Churchill is apparently unrepentant despite German indignation over his magazine attack on Hitler, for in an election speech tonight he again referred to the Nazi chieftain as justification for British rearmament. „When you see the German dictator setting the whole of his people working on munitions,“ said Mr. Churchill, „I do not think you should allow this country to go on without doing something.“
Article Dealt With Purges. By The Associated Press.
LONDON, Oct. 30. — Winston Churchill’s article in The Strand Magazine said only time would tell whether Adolf Hitler would be a monster or a hero. Mr. Churchill professed to be astounded that the educated German people had endorsed Hitler’s blood purges. The article said what was left of European civilization must hang its head in shame and fear before this fact.
Eine deutschsprachige Zeitung, die im schweizerischen Basel erscheinende Nationalzeitung, kommentierte am 3. November: